<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In defence of Facebook (sort of)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/</link>
	<description>Scrapbook of a labor-geek - Unions 2.0 in the UK and around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:43:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/#comment-924</guid>
		<description>True Wade, but I think we&#039;re talking different things here. The amazing campaign in Oz was the work of hundreds of organisers, with tens of thousands of activists and a multi-million ad budget through a levy from millions of members - though it did have hundreds of offshoot activities which were small affairs that contributed to the core. What we&#039;re seeing a lot on Facebook is campaign groups where an organiser gets a couple hundred members to join, as a kind of online petition, and it&#039;s not having a lot of effect. You&#039;re right about some small things growing though, and there will be ways to actively mobilise people better here that could contribute more than passive membership of small groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True Wade, but I think we&#8217;re talking different things here. The amazing campaign in Oz was the work of hundreds of organisers, with tens of thousands of activists and a multi-million ad budget through a levy from millions of members &#8211; though it did have hundreds of offshoot activities which were small affairs that contributed to the core. What we&#8217;re seeing a lot on Facebook is campaign groups where an organiser gets a couple hundred members to join, as a kind of online petition, and it&#8217;s not having a lot of effect. You&#8217;re right about some small things growing though, and there will be ways to actively mobilise people better here that could contribute more than passive membership of small groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wade</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Now I’m not able to point to any great union successes here, and this is unsurprisingly a rather big flaw in my arguments against Eric’s article. A few hundred in a campaign group here, a few hundred there aren’t going to change the world,


I am sorry but a few hundred in a capaign  can change  the world . You only have to look at History to see  that . For Example  a on line  campaign with TV and radio  by the union movment of Australia  Successfully brough down goverment at election.  That was 20 millon  people who voted. Not bad for a few hundred organizer from the Union .   Small things grow to big things  just like face book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I’m not able to point to any great union successes here, and this is unsurprisingly a rather big flaw in my arguments against Eric’s article. A few hundred in a campaign group here, a few hundred there aren’t going to change the world,</p>
<p>I am sorry but a few hundred in a capaign  can change  the world . You only have to look at History to see  that . For Example  a on line  campaign with TV and radio  by the union movment of Australia  Successfully brough down goverment at election.  That was 20 millon  people who voted. Not bad for a few hundred organizer from the Union .   Small things grow to big things  just like face book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Education Not For Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Education Not For Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>[...] Wood, who took the initiative to set up the Facebook group to protest the ban on Derek, has written a response to my article, which is worth reading in full. He too is not uncritical of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wood, who took the initiative to set up the Facebook group to protest the ban on Derek, has written a response to my article, which is worth reading in full. He too is not uncritical of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johninnit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Whoosh!</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>johninnit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Whoosh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/#comment-915</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t believe it was solely the wonderful viral potential of the social network (as I was banging on about the other day). Possibly more significant in the development was the fact it made the lighthearted news slot (not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t believe it was solely the wonderful viral potential of the social network (as I was banging on about the other day). Possibly more significant in the development was the fact it made the lighthearted news slot (not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johninnit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free the Blackadder One!</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>johninnit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free the Blackadder One!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2008/01/23/in-defence-of-facebook-sort-of/#comment-897</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; In defence of Facebook (sort of) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; In defence of Facebook (sort of) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
