<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>johninnit &#187; injunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johninnit.co.uk/tag/injunction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk</link>
	<description>occasional scrapbook of a labor geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BA injunction: WTF?</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2009/12/17/ba-injunction-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2009/12/17/ba-injunction-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[unionbusting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/?p=984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Beeb: A strike by British Airways cabin crew planned for Christmas has been declared illegal in a High Court ruling. The court agreed with BA that the cabin crew&#8217;s union, Unite, had not correctly balloted its members on the strike action. BA complained that staff in the process of leaving the company had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Beeb:</p>
<blockquote><p>A strike by British Airways cabin crew planned for Christmas has been declared illegal in a High Court ruling. The court agreed with BA that the cabin crew&#8217;s union, Unite, had not correctly balloted its members on the strike action. BA complained that staff in the process of leaving the company had been balloted, breaching industrial relations law.</p></blockquote>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this a technicality? The union need under law to get a majority of those voting within a bargaining unit, and they did &#8211; with a huge 90% voting on an equally impressive 80% turnout. Even if some voting were ineligible to strike, the turnout was so high that removing the suggested up to 1000 votes would surely still clearly carry the ballot &#8211; especially as you&#8217;d have to reduce the size of the overall bargaining unit by those who weren&#8217;t eligible (thus lowering the threshold even further for the ballot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2009/12/17/ba-injunction-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

