<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>johninnit &#187; Tories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johninnit.co.uk/tag/tories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk</link>
	<description>Scrapbook of a labor-geek - Unions 2.0 in the UK and around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How is this compassionate Conservatism then?</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2010/04/21/how-is-this-compassionate-conservatism-then/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2010/04/21/how-is-this-compassionate-conservatism-then/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This new poster bothers me. It looks like Cameron is in full headless mode now, and frantically trying to shore up traditional support to the right, as his support to the left comes under threat from Cleggmania. But what does this do to his carefully crafted image as a progressive Tory?
Their plans for tackling the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2010/04/21/how-is-this-compassionate-conservatism-then/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tory family policy jumps the shark</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2010/04/13/tory-family-policy-jumps-the-shark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2010/04/13/tory-family-policy-jumps-the-shark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage tax break]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poking fun at Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/?p=1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Still smarting that we&#8217;re not considered wholesome enough for a Cameron marriage tax break &#8211; my wife earns a few hundred quid too much &#8211; I was cheered a bit to see Sunder Katwala&#8217;s recent post on Next Left. It looks like we&#8217;re in good company.
It&#8217;s supposed to cover civil partnerships too (might buy them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2010/04/13/tory-family-policy-jumps-the-shark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How DO they do that?</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2009/10/02/how-do-they-do-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2009/10/02/how-do-they-do-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teh Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MyConservatives.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Certainly impressed with the state of the art technology on MyConservatives.com!

I mean, being able to instantly automatically identify me as a wrong &#8216;un from my IP addy and targetedly refuse me access like this, whilst I imagine letting all the 2.0Tories straight in without any hiccups, that&#8217;s some mad skillz! Would expect nothing less from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2009/10/02/how-do-they-do-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxing our patience</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/10/02/taxing-our-patience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/10/02/taxing-our-patience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-doms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/10/02/taxing-our-patience/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tories under fire in the Guardian today for their non-dom tax plans, as it seems there may not actually be that many people to pay the non-dom charge. What surprised me most though was the tiny level of the charge &#8211; a fraction of what these people owe. Surely better to get as many as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/10/02/taxing-our-patience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work long and prosper?</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/17/work-long-and-prosper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/17/work-long-and-prosper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inheritance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Redwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red tape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/17/work-long-and-prosper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good spin for Redwood, getting the story of his wide-ranging policy review boiled down to just inheritance tax in the papers today, rather than coming over as an evil masterplan to work us til we drop, and then mortgage an unregulated timeshare to our remains. The structural flaws in the unreported iceberg seem to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/17/work-long-and-prosper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nul points</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/17/nul-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/17/nul-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asabailey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Redwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poking fun at Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/17/nul-points/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m really coming round to how good this new Tory viral ad format is. I mean, loads of stuff must have doubled under Labour that they could make videos about. Got me thinking&#8230;

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/17/nul-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Tory viral ad</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/16/new-tory-viral-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/16/new-tory-viral-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asabailey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poking fun at Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/16/new-tory-viral-ad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice note from Asabailey, viral marketing gurus and new Tory ad agency. I like their stuff a lot (my favourite of late has to be their Cannes Web2.0 song &#8211; more than a bit NSFW btw). Anyway, they&#8217;re showing the first of their new series of Tory attack ads on YouTube:
 In response to Lord [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/16/new-tory-viral-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No rest for the wicked?</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/15/no-rest-for-the-wicked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/15/no-rest-for-the-wicked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work/life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directorships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Redwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/15/no-rest-for-the-wicked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah.. it all makes sense now:

Of the 27 members of David Cameron&#8217;s Shadow Cabinet, 12 have outside jobs with 32 directorships between them. The 120 members of the shadow government team hold 115 paid directorships or other outside posts between them. This means they rake in thousands on top of their £60,675-a-year MP salaries. Daily [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/15/no-rest-for-the-wicked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the water&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/12/just-when-you-thought-it-was-safe-to-go-back-into-the-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/12/just-when-you-thought-it-was-safe-to-go-back-into-the-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Redwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red tape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/12/just-when-you-thought-it-was-safe-to-go-back-into-the-water/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s Torygraph front page (look, I had to buy it for work, okay!), left me pretty speechless. The nasty party is well and truly back. Redwood and Osborne plan a new policy direction to launch on Friday, but it seems to be too juicy a story to keep wraps on.
The idea is that we could [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/08/12/just-when-you-thought-it-was-safe-to-go-back-into-the-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vote Boris, get eaten&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/07/20/vote-boris-get-eaten/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/07/20/vote-boris-get-eaten/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA['elf n safety!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boris Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Vaughn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poking fun at Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/07/20/vote-boris-get-eaten/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Prospective mayoral candidate Boris Johnson is no fan of health and safety regulations, apparently  regularly declaring his hero to be Larry Vaughn, the fictional mayor in Jaws, who refused to close the beaches after expert testimony and evidence of the first shark attack, leading to another free lunch for the film&#8217;s eponymous anti-hero.
Apparently the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johninnit.co.uk/2007/07/20/vote-boris-get-eaten/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
